Anti-colonial uprisings in Karnataka 1800-1860
Shivanand Kanavi
The micro-stories from different
parts of Karnataka during the six decades of 19th century (1800-1860)give
us an indication of the wide- spread nature of anti-colonial struggles in
different parts of India. Clearly they had spread among commoners and gentry
and a national anti-colonial consciousness had seeped down to the remotest
village.
(This article appeared in Ghadar Jari Hai Vol 6, No, 2-3,
May-Oct 2012)
It is unfortunate that we in India have not studied the
facts regarding the 1857 revolt nor have we digested the lessons from it. Our
conception is dominated by the British narrative. In short, they painted the
revolt as a feudal reaction to the modernity of industrial Britain. British
historians took great pains to paint all the leaders and heroes of 1857 as
decadent, two-faced, selfish, reactionary, turn-coats who were fighting against
loss of privileges and had no conception of national consciousness or peoples’
welfare. More over according to British historians, to carry out their personal
agendas, the leaders inflamed religious fanaticism and misled people who were
otherwise happy to be ruled by the British. Of course they also displayed
British colonial “even handedness and fair
play”, by pointing out that there was “some disaffection in the population and
even the troops of the British Indian Army caused by the high handedness of
some Company officials, however things became fine after the Company was
replaced by the British Crown through Queen Victoria’s Proclamation in 1858 and
“the rule of law” was established.
However a remarkably rich literature exists in various
Indian languages in the form of ballads, folk songs and legends and even
documents and reports, which is not accessible to English readers. An excellent
beginning in giving the Indian point of view was made by V D Savarkar in his
book “The Indian war of independence 1857”, published underground in 1907. It
has been followed up in the last 20 years by various micro studies and finally
by a significant two volume work, “War of Civilisations: 1857 AD” by Amaresh
Misra.
This article tries to put together some highlights of
anti-colonial struggles in the post-Hyder-Tipu-Karnataka from 1800-1860. In
1779 itself Hyder and Tipu had tried to put together a confederacy and worked
out an agreement with Nana Fadanvis, Janoji Bhosle, Mahadji Scindhia and Nizam
according to which Hyder was supposed to attack the Arcot area and Madras,
Janoji Bhosle on Bengal, Nana Fadanvis and Mahadji Scindhia on Bombay and the Nizam
on Circar districts. While Hyder and Tipu went ahead with the plan the others
did not. If this grand plan had succeeded then perhaps India would have been
rid of British colonial rule 80 years before 1857. However the narrow concerns
of some rulers enabled the East India Company to meticulously play on petty
selfishness and rule a continental sized diverse country like India for almost
two hundred years.
In this article we have put together some highlights of
anti-colonial uprisings in Karnataka between 1800 and 1860. The great struggle
between Hyder Ali-Tipu Sultan and the British was already over by 1799 with
Tipu’s death in the 4th Anglo-Mysore war. The micro-stories from
different parts of Karnataka in those six decades tell us how wide- spread the
anti-colonial struggles were in different parts of India and how they had
spread among commoners and gentry and how deep the consciousness had seeped
down to the remotest village.
On the occasion of Golden Jubilee of the formation of
Karnataka State many historians have documented to a considerable degree the
colonial history of Karnataka. They have recorded dozens of armed uprisings in
Karnataka prior to 1857 besides the most famous one led by Hyder Ali and Tipu
Sultan. One can see concrete linkages of these revolts with the uprising in the
North. Many letters of request of support written by Nanasaheb to various
principalities in North and coastal Karnataka, which were responded to by local
kings have also come to light.
After the defeat and Tipu’s death in the battle field in the
fourth Anglo-Mysore war (1799), Karnataka was literally torn asunder between the
British presidencies of Bombay and Madras; Nizam of Hyderabad and Marathas. A
small dependency was created under the tutelage of Wodeyars as the kingdom of
Mysore, which increased the land revenue and the burden on peasantry in an
arbitrary manner to satisfy British demands. This led to uprisings in kingdom
of Mysore as well as areas of Karnataka which had now been brought under,
Nizam, Maratha and British rule. A few of them are briefly described below:
Dhondiya Wagh (1800):
One of the first to revolt against the new arrangement was
Dhondiya Wagh. He was born in Chennagiri near Mysore. He joined Hyder Ali’s
cavalry in 1780. Later he developed differences with Tipu, who incarcerated
him. Hence British soldiers found Dhondiya in Srirangapattana’s prison when
they ransacked the city after the death of Tipu. Dhondiya was released, who
however immediately vanished and tried to gather the demobilised Tipu’s
soldiers. Very soon he built up a significant armed force with a cavalry etc.
He kept moving from territory to territory and capturing small towns and forts that
had been taken over by Marathas, British and the Nizam. Governor General,
Richard Wellesley was exasperated by Dhondiya’s revolt and assigned his brother
Arthur Wellesley (Later to be known as Duke of Wellington, who defeated
Napolean at Waterloo) to suppress Dhondiya’s revolt. He sent troops not only
from Madras but even summoned some from Bengal.
The theatre of Dhondiya’s war encompassed forts at
Chitradurg, Savanur, Shimoga, Bidanur, Honnali, Harihar, Shikaripur, Kittur,
Londa, Ranebennur, Kundgol, Shirahatti, Kunigal, Dharwad, Gadag, Raichur, Hungund etc. Practically it
encompassed all of Central and North Karnataka. He was supported by the people
and smaller principalities (samsthana) that were discontented with the British.
Tipu’s son Fateh Hyder supported him and Tipu’s former soldiers were the core
of his forces which at one point grew to over 70,000 with a 30,000 strong cavalry.
The British troops were led by Col, Stevenson, Col Wellesly, Col Tolin, Col
Mclean, Col Darlymple. The heroic campaign lasted from June 1799 to September
1800. In the end Dhondiya was cornered by British, Maratha and Nizam’s troops
and fell for a bullet in the battle at Konegal.
British historians have painted him as “rogue bandit”,
whereas Dhondiya himself had the title of “lord of both the worlds” among his
people. Edward Clive a British officer later admired his organising ability and
said “what started as an anarchic revolt became a major international war”.
Nationalist historians have described him as, “a person with great
determination and a magnetic personality”.
Venkatadri Nayak
(1803)
Aigur (Ballam) Venkatadri Nayak was another leader who
started his revolt when the British were tied down by Dhondiya Wagh. His father
Krishnappa Nayak, was made the ruler of Aigur by Hyder Ali. But Krishnappa
betrayed him and joined the Marathas in 1792 and helped the British. After the
war he was scared of Tipu and ran away to Kodagu (Coorg). However Tipu did not
punish him but instead reinstated him. On Tipu’s defeat in 1799, Krishnappa’s
son Venkatadri Nayak became the ruler of Aigur. He was ambitious and started
expanding his territory. Venkatadri Nayak captured Subrahmanya Ghat, a crucial
pass in the Sahyadris with access to Mangalore. He attacked the British troops
at Arakere and also defeated a 2500 strong army sent by Wodeyar of Mysore.
Venkatadri Nayak came to be known as the Bull Raja and
Ballam Raja. Wellesley took his revolt very seriously and made an elaborate
plan to capture him by getting troops from Mangalore as well as Bombay, Bidnur
and Sondha. The British tried to organise all the Patels of surrounding
villages against him and also terrorised the population by executing many of
his sympathisers. They generally followed
a scorched earth policy to prevent him getting any food supplies. The
campaign lasted nearly three years and finally on February 10, 1803 he and his
6 followers were arrested when they were in search of food supplies. All the
insurgents were later executed. Thus two great warriors were suppressed by the
British with Machiavellian tactics using the Mysore Wodeyars, Marathas and the
Nizam.
Koppal Veerappa
(1819):
As mentioned earlier Karnataka was torn asunder between
Nizam, Marathas and the British after Tipu’s defeat. The North eastern parts
were taken over by Nizam, who put unbearable burden on the peasantry. The Nizam
was totally under British control with the Subsidiary Alliance signed in 1800.
As a result of which the Nizam had to pay for the British Subsidiary Force
stationed to “protect him” and even accept the humiliating condition that the
British would decide who the top bureaucrat—the Diwan of Hyderabad would be. As
Nizam’s unbridled oppression with heavy taxation increased, there was no way
but for the peasantry to revolt. One such revolt was led by Veerappa in Koppal
in 1818. Veerapaa was a small landowner in Koppal, he built a force and
captured Koppal and Bahadur (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3SWXcLH0UA)
forts built by Hyder Ali 40 years earlier. British forces led by Major Doughton
and Brig General Pritzler rushed to crush Veerappa and Nizam’s general
Idruskhan also joined them. Veerappa fought valiantly for five days with only
500 men and died in battle. Even though Veerappa’s rebellion was confined to a
small area around Koppal, it represented a popular peasant revolt and inspired
many more in the region.
Deshmukhs of Bidar
(1820)
After Tipu’s defeat the remnants of the old Bahmani Kingdom
of Bidar too were incorporated into Nizam’s rule and burdened with heavy
taxation. As a result revolts started appearing in 1820 in Udgir. Using Suliyal
as their base the local Deshmukhs led by Shivalingayya, Tirumal Rao and
Meghsham led this revolt. Hence this revolt is known as the revolt of
Deshmukhs. The Nizam relied on British help to suppress the Deshmukhs. Lt Gen
Sutherland was assigned for the same and he defeated them in a campaign lasting
two months and imprisoned them.
Sindagi Revolt (1824)
The popular revolt against the British spread to Bijapur too
and in Sindagi, 40 km from Bijapur the local people led by Chidambar Dikshit,
his son Diwakar Dikshit and Diwakar’s comrades Shettyappa, Raoji and Rastiya
declared sovereignty of people of Sindagi. They took over Sindagi Taluk and
boldly declared that “British Raj does
not exist here and we anyway do not recognise it. We are sovereign”. British could not tolerate this challenge to
their rule in such a brazen way even though it was confined to a Taluk in North
Karnataka. They sent forces led by Lt Stevenson to capture the leaders. However
the forces could not locate the leaders. A traitor Annappa Patne however showed
the hiding place to the British. The local people who came to know the same
lynched Annappa on the spot. However the British were able to capture the
leaders and imprison them. The revolt was confined to a Taluk, but showed
advanced consciousness.
Rani Chennamma and
the Kittur Revolt(1824)
Rani Chennamma of Kittur is a veritable icon in Karnataka
and was perhaps one of the first women leaders who fought against British Raj.
To this day she inspires people. She was born in the Desai family of Kakati, a
small village in the wealthy kingdom of Kittur, which stood around 5 km north
of Belgavi in Karnataka. In her youth she received training in horse riding,
sword fighting and archery. She became the queen of Kittur on her marriage to Shivalinga
Rudra Sarja, of the Desai family of Kittur.
Kittur was a principality (samsthana) covering large parts
of Dharwad and Belgavi districts and was paying tributes to Marathas after the
fall of Tipu. However after the fall of Marathas in 1818, Kittur came under
British rule. Shivalinga Rudra Sarja did not have children and when he fell
sick, he asked his close confidant Gurusiddappa to choose a boy from the
surrounding region to be adopted as the heir to the throne. Shivalingappa was
such a boy who was then trained in appropriate manner, renamed Mallasarja and
adopted as the heir to Kittur. Shivalinga Rudra Sarja died soon after on
September 11, 1824.
Chennamma started ruling the kingdom in the name of the
minor prince. However Thackeray the then collector and political agent in
Dharwad arbitrarily refused to recognise this and asked the British Governor,
Elphinstone in Bombay to take over the kingdom under paramountcy—a ruse three
decades later formalised by Dalhousie as the Doctrine of Lapse.
In a clear act of provocation he declared that the treasury
of the kingdom was not safe and hence brought in his own guards and
administrators to “protect” the same. He even left a few soldiers to “guard”
the main gate of Kittur Fort. These provocations enraged the people of Kittur.
Chennamma patiently tried to get justice and sent her emissaries to talk to the
“Company Sarkar” (British East India Company) and at the same time started
strengthening the fort and carrying out various military preparations
anticipating a conflict. She called all the loyal fighters from the surrounding
region and discussed the situation with them, sought their advice and loyalty.
Thackeray was surprised by the Rani’s gumption. He invited the Rani for talks, which
she refused. While Thackeray was gathering his forces the fighters of Kittur
readied themselves inside the fort and carried out a daring attack on the
British forces. Chennamma directed the battle from the ramparts of the fort. On
her orders, Balasaheb Sayyad, Rani Chennamma’s loyal sharpshooter, killed
Thackeray. Thus Thackeray came to a sorry end on October 23, 1824 and along
with him two more officers Capt Black Stevenson and Lt Dicton also died.
British forces were roundly defeated and many were taken prisoners by the
insurgents.
This was a great setback for British Raj and its cultivated image
as an invincible force in the region. They soon gathered forces from Sholapur,
Mysore and Bombay and neared Kittur. Rani sent them a message that if they
attack Kittur then all British prisoners of war will be put to death and then
the people of Kittur will fight to death. Taken aback, Chaplin, Commissioner of
Deccan sent a message that if the British prisoners are released and Sardar
Gurusiddappa is handed over then the status quo will prevail. Chennamma refused
to hand over Gurusiddappa but released British prisoners as an act of good
faith. However Chaplin had no intention of keeping his end of the deal and sent
his forces under the leadership of Lt Col Deacon to siege Kittur on Dec 3,
1824. The fighters of Kittur fought bravely for three days, however due to
treachery they found that their gun powder had been mixed with cow dung and
made useless. The fort fell. Rani Chennamma escaped with the younger Rani
Veeramma through a secret passage towards Sangolli where she had supporters.
However British were able to intercept her on her way and
capture her. She was imprisoned in Bailhongal prison. After incarceration of
four years Chennamma died in prison on February 3, 1829. The Kittur countryside
was full of rebellion for over five years. The leader of this rebellion was
Rani Chennamma’s ardent admirer Rayanna of Sangolli.
Sangolli Rayanna
(1829)
Sangolli Rayanna, a Rani Chennamma loyalist, who led revolts around Kittur after Rani's
capture. A subject of popular plays and lavanis (ballads)
Rayanna was born in a shepherd family in Sangolli, a village
in Belgavi district. The family had a fighting tradition and was loyal to the
Desais of Kittur. Rayanna fought with the Kittur army in 1824 and was captured
by the British after the defeat of Rani. However soon he was released as a part
of British pacification program. His family members had generous tax free lands
given as Inam by the Desais, for their earlier bravery and loyalty. However the
Company Sarkar now increased the taxes and eventually confiscated his lands. In
November-December 1829, when he was restless, some of his friends invited him
to lead a revolt against the British. Rayanna soon started a guerrilla war
suitable to the surrounding landscape. He gathered a compact group of fighters
and started attacking treasuries and rich land owners who were British
collaborators. He seized mortgage and debt documents of peasantry from them and
burnt them. He soon gathered over 1000 fighters and harassed the British and
their collaborators relentlessly.
Realising that it was not possible to capture Rayanna by
conventional warfare, British adopted other means to do so. They sent in some
spies into his army and caught him unarmed when he was bathing in a river. He
and his associates were executed and many sent abroad for life imprisonment.
Interestingly though British rewarded the traitors who
betrayed Rayanna very generously through land grants, the entire community
socially boycotted them. Even today the legend has it that those families are
cursed for generations and if anyone goes to their homes for a lunch or dinner
as a guest then the food in their plates will turn into maggots!
Rayanna’s revolt inspired other loyalists of Kittur too to
rise up time and again. Gurusiddappa, Shankaranna, Gajapati, Savai Shetti,
Kotagi, Shaikh Suleiman, Bheemanna, Kaddigudda Balanna, Waddar Yellanna etc led
several uprisings against the British in support of Kittur for almost a decade.
The rebels executed the traitors who had betrayed Rayanna and rose up time and
gain demonstrating their love and pride for the Rani Chennamma of Kittur.
Nagar Peasant Revolt
(1830-31)
Nagar comprised of the taluks of Sagar, Nagar, Kowlidurga, Koppa,
Lakwally, Sorab, Shikarpur, Shivamogga, Honnaly, Harihar, Chennagiri, Tarikere,
Kadur, and Chickamagalur. Besides, there
were 5277 villages, 1277 hamlets. Its population was 459,842. The Ikkeri
dynasty ruled this region and gained respect and prestige through an independent
distinguished rule from the Vijaynagar times to late 18th century
when they were taken over by Hyder Ali and Tipu. The region had a fighting
tradition. When the Wodeyars and Diwan Poornaiah were installed in Mysore by
East India Company after Tipu’s defeat, the region came under heavy taxation.
In fact nearly 60% of the Kingdom’s revenues were coming from this region alone.
After suffering from the duo’s arbitrariness for three decades, 1800-1830, the
region was ripe for rebellion against the Wodeyars and their protectors—the
“Company Sarkar”.
The administration was entirely corrupt and filled with
nepotism and casteism. The local Nayak’s and Patels and ryots were fed up of
this state of affairs and the heavy tax burden. This situation was utilised by
Boodi Basavappa, who assumed leadership of the uprising and declared himself
the new ruler. He declared sovereignty and pardoned the heavy taxes and peasant
debt to Sahukars (money lenders).
The result was one of the largest peasant revolts in
colonial India.
According to Dr Siddalinga Swamy, the greatest burden to
cultivators was an advance payment of money to the government before the grain
was harvested. As no renter, or
cultivator had money to advance, he was obliged to take recourse to the Sahukars,
who advanced money at the rate of two per cent per month and extracted a
present of five per cent upon the advance. For the second and third instalment,
a present was not demanded; but when the fourth was to be paid the crops were
to be mortgaged. Most lenders insisted upon an immediate sale, and became the
purchasers themselves at the bazar price, which would then be lower than at any
other period. Many debt burdened ryots flocked to the government to make complaints
against Sahukars. But the sahukars were powerful. The Government also owed
large sums of money to Sahukars. In February 1826 the peasant debt to Sahukars in
Nagar was estimated at 4 lakh.
This sorry state of affairs depicted a weak and ignorant
government managed by corrupt officers,
unable to correct the sources of evil inherent in it. As the Wodeyar’s
Government was corrupt, no control was exercised over the district officers.
Naturally the people were enraged by the unjust and arbitrary acts of those
officers. There was no process in the country which required public servants to
hear the complaints of the ryots. This was the fertile ground for the
insurrection in 1830.
Taking advantage of this, Basavappa spread the news that he
had assumed the sovereignty of the country and promised the ryots full
remission of all balance debt. A reduction of the Government tax demand on
their lands was also promised, if they would espouse his cause. Many
inflammatory speeches were made by supporters of Boodi Basavappa in August
1830, asking ryots to join them. One of his supporters, made an unsuccessful
attempt to capture the fort of Anandapur in Nagar province. On 23rd August the
ryots of Nagar circulated a letter in the other fouzdaris, inviting other ryots
to assemble in a koota (assembly). On 23rd September the ryots of Chennagiri
refused to pay their taxes, and other taluks in Nagar fouzdari followed them.
In December, Fouzdar Viraraj Urs employed troops to disperse demonstrators at
Holehonnur. The ryots of the Chitradurg
and Bangalore Divisions also refused to pay taxes and joined the movement.
In the meantime efforts were made by Diwan Venkat Raj in
Bangalore and Chitradurg Divisions to pacify the ryots. The Maharaja himself
under took to tour some of the taluks in December 1830. However he was
humiliated by the ryots in Channarayapattana and in many other places.
The rebels gave a good fight to the troops. They captured
some of the forts in Nagar, and in many places they repulsed the Mysore troops.
On the 21st of December 1830 a Proclamation was issued
directing all persons carrying bones and Neem leaves (the symbols of
insurrection) to be seized, tried and if convicted, to be hanged. On the
following day instructions were given to the fouzdar of Bangalore to fire on
the protesters and to catch one or two protesters in each taluk and hang them
to spread terror among the populace. Many of the rebels were caught and
hanged. Some of the rebels’ noses and
ears were cut off resulting in several persons being badly disfigured.
The Raja said that this measure was indispensable to put
down the rebellion. As a result hundreds of ryots were hanged throughout the
territory. The Raja asserted that in ordering executions he did not act of his
own accord, but in compliance with the advice of the British Resident.
The reverses to the Mysore troops led to the employment of
Company’s forces to quell the revolt. On 31st May 1831, the stronghold of the
rebels, Nagar, was captured and the revolt was practically quelled. But stray bands of insurgency continued till
1832 when it was completely suppressed.
The rebellion was spontaneous and did not have a visionary
leadership but it however demonstrated the widespread anger among different
sections of Kannadigas against the British rule and as well as their puppets
like the Wodeyars and Poornaiah. The Company however used the occasion to
further strip any element of autonomy from the Wodeyars and Governor General
William Bentinck, appointed commissioners to administer the region.
Coastal Uprisings
(1830-31)
There were widespread uprisings against heavy taxation in
the coastal regions of Karnataka. These regions had first protested the taxes
earlier in 1809-1810. The later agitations learnt from this experience and were
consequently more audacious.
The documents of East India Company have called these
revolts as Koota revolts. Kootas were general assemblies of people of a village
or town, where they asserted their sovereignty, and hence a form of direct
democracy.
The mass struggle started in early 1830 and assumed a host
of forms. The most important of these, however, was the koota or simply
‘gathering’. The mass awakening was ignited through their assembly into kootas
which was a broad forum to organize the masses. While the struggles might have
been spontaneous, the form was quite well developed.
The signs of the peasant unrest could be seen in the closing
months of 1830, when the ryots gave general petitions complaining of their
losses. But they developed and came to the fore in the beginning months of
1831. The ryots of Kasargod, Kumbla, Mogral, Manjeshwar, Bungra-Manjeshawar and
Talapady sent general arzees (petitions) and complaints of their losses to
Dickinson the Collector of South Kanara.
In their petitions, the ryots not only complained about the
harsh revenue assessment of November 1830, but they also demanded remission to
them all at a uniform rate.
In the second stage, beginning of January 1831, the ryots
started their Kootas or assemblages.
It was in Bekal (Kasargod) that the Kootas started in the
first week of January 1831 and within a few days they spread to the northern
parts of Kanara.
Barkur, Brahmavar, Buntwal, Madhur, Manjeshwar, Mulki,
Kadri, Kumbla, Malluly (Malali), Wamanjoor, Mogral, Udyawar, Uppinangadi and
Vittal were some of the important places where the ryots of the respective
regions had assembled in Kootas or assemblages. The Kootas extended to North
Kanara also. Manjunatha temple at Kadri was the centre of these peasant
uprisings, where the Grand Koota [Maha Koota] was organised towards the end of
January 1831. Ryots from other important centres of the district such as
Kasargod and Buntwal came and met at Kadri. The Venkataramana temple at Basrur,
the Mahamayi temple at Mangalore, the temple at Manjeswar and another temple at
Wamanjoor were other important centres of the Koota movement.
In order to organise these Kootas, the ryots assigned one
Patel and two head ryots in each of the villages. When any aspect was discussed
and plan or action was proposed in the Kootas, these leaders disseminated them
to the ryots in the villages. Further, each of the Kootas had its own leaders
and all of them met and discussed (at the Grand Koota in Kadri). The organisers
of these Kootas also made use of a ‘Secret Council’ or a secretariat. The
object of this Council was to maintain the secrecy of the whole organisational
affair of the Kootas. However, the result of the deliberations of this Council
was communicated to the various assemblies or Kootas. Thus the Secret Council
played the role of a linking and organising body in these peasant uprisings. It
in fact acted as a think-tank of the rebellion. Further, anonymous pamphlets
were made use of by the leaders to spread their ideas and programmes among the
ryots.
The participants in these Kootas at times made bold to
attack Government servants. Before Dickinson left Kundapura for Mangalore at
the end of January 1831 he received reports from the Tahsildar of Barkur that
the ryots of that taluk had assembled in Koota and had assaulted some of the
public servants. The report of the Tahsildar of Barkur says that a Magane Shanbhog,
who was deputed to read a government proclamation was severely assaulted. Again
at Mulki the ryots roughed up an Ameen who had been sent to read them a
proclamation issued by the Government. The ryots were determined to refuse to
give taxes to the Government, until a fresh settlement was made, and their mood
was so defiant that they unhesitatingly attacked those public servants whom
they feared not long back. The growing sense of unity among themselves and
faith in their organisational strength had emboldened them to take such
postures of defiance. The peasant rebellion that surfaced in the month of
November 1830 continued up to the end of March 1831. It was after Cameron’s
promise (March 1831) to the ryots that their petitions would be considered and
remissions would be made after an examination of their losses to redress their
hardships that they dispersed and stopped organising the Kootas. Thus by April
1831 the rumblings of Koota rebellions died down.
Kodagu (Coorg)
Revolts (1833-37)
After the defeat of Tipu, the East India Company could not
directly rule Kodagu. They had to restore the kingdom to the traditional kings
of Haleri dynasty who were earlier displaced by Hyder and Tipu. However these
Haleri kings were fiercely independent and particularly Chikka Veera Rajendra
(1820-34) was a proud and independent king. He refused to follow British diktat
and instead armed his population and built up his forces to resist any British
attack. He corresponded with Maharaja Ranjit Singh of Punjab and sought his
support against the British.
There were constant skirmishes between him and the British
administration, which was based in Bangalore and Mysore and finally a war
between the British and Kodava forces was inevitable. Despite brave fight put
up by the Kodavas the British were able to capture the Madikeri fort through
treachery in 1834 and depose the king. He was sent in Exile to Bangalore, Kashi
and later London.
However the fighting people of Kodagu did not take this
lying down and several revolts took place. These were led by Swami Aparampaar,
Kalyan Swami and Putta Basava. All these fighters claimed to be heirs to Kodagu
throne one after another and sought support from the people in their fight
against the British in the name of Haleri dynasty. Each one of them was given
due respect and recognition by the people as true heirs of Kodagu and thousands
joined them. All of them sought to throw out British from Kodagu, cancel the
taxes imposed by them and fought for an independent life for Kodavas. These
uprisings went on from 1834 to 1837.
Other revolts before
1857
There were several other revolts which were local and minor
in dimension but which had a lot of impact on the psyche of the people of North
Karnataka between 1840 and 1857. One of them was in Badami, a town in today’s
Bagalkot district, which has an ancient history and was the capital of
Chalukyas who ruled much of Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh between 6th
and 8th centuries CE. An army
built by loyalists of the deposed king of Satara took over the fort and
established their rule in 1839-40. They were suppressed by British Army and the
leaders sentenced to death and life imprisonment.
Similarly there were uprisings in Nippani, currently in
Belgavi district, in 1840-41, where over 300 Arab fighters under the leadership
of local Zamindar, Raghunath Rao attacked the fort and took it over. Later they
were suppressed by the Company Army. In 1849 the Paleygar of Chitradurga rose
up unsuccessfully. Revolts led by Lingappa in Bidar in 1852 harassed the
British for several months and he had captured several forts.
Uprisings in
Karnataka during Ghadar of 1857
There were several uprisings in Karnataka during the Ghadar in
1857 and went on till 1860. Unlike the Gangetic belt, where the revolt was signalled
by mutiny of British Indian Army, which were then followed by revolts led by
Nanasaheb, Zeenat Mahal, Rani Laxmibai of Jhansi, Kunwar Singh et al, the
Karnataka revolts were popular uprisings led by local peasant leaders, or small
principalities who linked their local struggles with the larger national one that
was being fought under Bahadur Shah Zafar and Nana Saheb’s leadership. The area
of uprising covered the entire districts from the coastal Canara (present day
Karwar and Mangalore) in the Madras Presidency, to the eastern Raichur and
Koppal districts under the Nizam; from Bijapur and Dharwad in the North in
Bombay Presidency to Sringeri and Hassan in the south.
Notable among them are the uprisings of: Bedas in Halagali
near Bijapur; revolt of Nargund near Gadag and Dharwad; revolt of Mundargi
Bhimaraya; revolt of Venkatappa Nayak of Surpur near Gulburga and Supa revolts near
Karwar.
Bedas of Halagali
One of the fighting tribes which fought the British tooth
and nail from 1820’s to 1942 and formed the backbone of many uprisings in the
Deccan (comprising Maharashtra, Karnataka and Andhra) were Bedas who descended
from hunters. They have been called Ramoshis, Berad, or Bedas, Boya, Dorabiddu
and Valmiki in different areas.
Bearing arms to protect themselves and the community and
their king was part of their life and they did it with great pride. The prince
of Mudhol had accepted British overlordship and the Bedas in the area were
seething with dissatisfaction. The East India Company announced on 11 September,
1857 that all Indians should disarm, submit their arms to the company and then
get licences to carry arms. This was simply out of question for Bedas. Hence
when the Company Sarkar’s edict was sought to be implemented by the King of
Mudhol principality, the Bedas of Halagali and surrounding area considered it a
great insult and defied him. They did not allow any official to enter their
villages. They did not even allow an arms’ census to be taken and did not
accept the offer that they will not be actually disarmed but will all be given
licences to bear arms. They said, “Bearing arms is our birth right and why
should we take anybody’s permission for the same?”
The revolt, which started in a small village called
Halagali, kept snowballing and started spreading to surrounding areas. The
British Raj saw it as a serious threat to its rule and when the local ruler was
not able to suppress it, Major Malcolm summoned the southern Maratha regiment
let by Lt Col Seton Karr. The bedas, though vastly outnumbered, fought fiercely
for their rights. The British followed a scorched earth policy in the region
and after the final battle captured 290 Bedas and hanged 19 leaders of the
uprising in Mudhol market in December 1857.
Nargund Bandaya
(revolt)
The principality of Nargund used to be under the Peshwas
after the defeat of Tipu. After the defeat of Peshwas in 1818, it came under
British overlordship. Bhaskar Rao Bhave also known as Baba Saheb rose to the
throne of Nargund in 1842 and administered this region efficiently. However he
did not have a son and told the British that he would adopt a son to create an
heir for Nargund. The British refused permission and asked him to return some
of the land received as Inam. This enraged Baba Saheb and he got in touch with
several rulers in Karnataka like Mundaragi Bhimaraya, Surpur Venkatappa Nayaka and
many others. He was aware of the north Indian uprising and wanted to time his
revolt also in June of 1857. However he postponed the date at the last moment.
Meanwhile the British came across his correspondence with other rulers due to
some traitors and informers. They were alarmed by it but Baba Saheb’s external
conduct with them was friendly and proper and hence they were lulled into not
taking immediate action. However, when they came to know that he had
accumulated a large amount of artillery and ammunition in his fort in Nargund,
they asked him to deposit the same in Dharwad. He readily agreed and sent them
with an escort to Dharwad. Simultaneously he secretly organised an attack on
the convoy and brought them back to Nargund, while claiming innocence.
In May 1858 when the British sent a force to prevent his
networking with other rulers, he attacked them and brought the decapitated head
of officer Manson, the head of British force sent to suppress him, to his fort
and displayed it to the people. Meanwhile he discovered treachery within his
fort leading to sabotage and adulteration of gun powder with cow dung. While he
went to attack the fort in Amargol near Hubballi, British came to Nargund with
a large force. Baba Saheb had over 2500 soldiers within the fort who fought
valiantly, when the defeat was imminent, Baba Saheb consulted his comrades and
decided to escape to a nearby forest. However in the forest near Torgal he was
betrayed by some camp followers. This led to his capture and later execution in
Belagavi on June 12, 1858. Nargund Bandaya is a legend in North Karnataka.
Interestingly, when a large peasant movement started in 1980
in North Karnataka, in the Malaprabha basin, it took a massive turn due to
brutal police firing on agitating peasants in Nargund and the vast mass peasant
movement that developed came to be known as the second Nargund Bandaya.
Surpur Venkatappa
Nayak
Surpur or Shorapur is situated in the hills, about 50 km
west of Yadgiri, a district headquarters. It was ruled by Beda Nayak kings who
had a fighting tradition. They had resisted even the mighty Mughals under
Aurangzeb. Later they were harassed by the Nizam, the Peshwas and the British
and the kingdom was reduced in size to only Surpur and Shapur taluks. When Raja
Krishnappa Nayak died in 1842, prince Venkatappa Nayak the 4th , was
only 8 years old. So the British created regency where the prince was enthroned
but Meadows Taylor a Briish administrator was appointed as the Regent. Taylor
was a scholar-administrator and greatly improved the condition of the kingdom
in terms of treasury, accounts, clearing the old debts owed to the Nizam and
Peshwa, public works, irrigation etc. In 1853 Taylor handed over the reins to
19 year old Venkatappa Nayak and retreated into the background.
In 1857, British got wind that some representatives of Nana
Saheb came to Surpur and had secret meetings with young Raja Venkatappa Nayak. In
the meanwhile, Mahipal Singh, a rebel from 1857 revolt, was captured by the
British and he disclosed to them that he was carrying out instructions of Raja
Venkatappa Nayak. The Company had actually administered the kingdom under
regency and the King had a close almost filial relationship with Col Meadows
Taylor. Even then, the British were very suspicious of Bedas in general as they
were playing an important anti-colonial role. So they started interfering more
and more in the affairs of the kingdom. Finally in February 1858, they sent
troops led by Capt Windham and Maj Hughes to attack Surpur, but the fort of
Surpur was very strong and a fierce battle ensued. When they were outnumbered,
the Raja escaped to Hyderabad and tried to get Nizam and his Diwan’s support
for the uprising. Unfortunately however, they handed him over to the British.
The Raja was sentenced to life imprisonment and while he was being transported
to Chenglepet jail from Sikandarabad, he was killed. The Raja Venkatappa Nayak
of Surpur was a lynchpin in a coordinated uprising covering Miraj, Kolhapur,
Koppal, Raichur and Surpur and hence the British were greatly relieved by his
defeat and the kingdom was given to Nizam for the services rendered to the East
India Company.
Mundaragi Bhimaraya
Bhimaraya of Mundaragi is a legendary hero of Ghadar of 1857
in Karnataka. There are many lavanis (ballads) written about him. He was not a
Raja but a commoner with extra ordinary vision and organising and mobilising
ability. His father was a local judge and Bhimaraya himself served as a
Mamledar (a land revenue official) in Bellary, Hoovina Hadagali and Harapana
Halli. He could not stand the exploitation of peasantry under British rule and
in protest he resigned and came back to Benne Halli, his village.
He had observed the development of anti-colonial movement in
Karnataka and networked with various like-minded leaders. Nana Saheb’s call to
the people of India and all Desais, Deshmukhs, Deshpandes, Jahagirdars, Patels
and Kulkarnis of Karnataka greatly influenced him. He had sent many emissaries
in the garb of Sadhus and Swamijis to contact others. He is also rumoured to
have secretly visited Bangalore and written a letter in vain to the Maharaja of
Mysore, Krishna Raja Wodeyar 3rd. Bhimaraya encouraged people in
various areas to refuse to pay taxes to Company Sarkar. He contacted various
groups of Beda fighters and started accumulating arms and creating ammunition dumps
at various places. On 23 May 1858 the fouzdar of Dambal raided one such arms
cache and sealed it. On hearing the news Bhimaraya came with his army attacked
the armoury and took back all his arms and ammunition and shifted to a safer
place in Shirahatti. Then he started raiding British armouries in various
places. Many local land owners and kings supported Bhimaraya and joined him in
the revolt. When British took Bhimarayas wife and kids as hostages, Bhimaraya
came with his army freed his family and went to the fort in Koppal and prepared
to fight with a large stock of food, arms and ammunition. British gathered a
large force from their stations at Dharwad, Raichur, Hyderabad and Bellary and
marched on Koppal fort. After a fierce fight Bhimaraya fell to British bullets
on 1 June, 1858. British carried out brutal reprisals against Bhimaraya’s
associates and supporters.
Canara Revolts
The district of Canara consisted of present Mangalore (Dakshina
Kannada) and Karwar (Uttara Kannada) districts and after Tipu, they were made a
part of Madras presidency. However these coastal districts were thickly
forested and mountainous and the large distance from Madras led to further
reasons for a weak British colonial state in the area. As uprisings in coastal
Maharashtra spread during 1857, Canara too became a refuge for revolutionaries
and also a centre of resistance. Here the revolutionaries who came from
Savantwadi played a major role. They also tried to get support from some Goans
as well as Portugese and moved into Khanapur, Supa, Ulavi, Dandeli etc. They
were also joined by Siddis (African slaves brought to India by Portugese and
who had escaped to the dense forests of Canara near Karwar). Though many
British historians have said that these revolts were caused by the increased
land and salt taxes, it is clear that they were inspired by the stories of 1857
uprising in the North and were waiting for Nanasaheb to move southwards.
Despite the death and capture of many leaders, new ones kept springing up in this
region for nearly three years. Finally British divided the district into two
and attached Karwar to Bombay presidency in 1862.
This brief account of anti-colonial uprisings in Karnataka
suffices to understand the deep felt hatred of British rule in every corner of
India. Karnataka threw up its own heroes and legends in resistance like
Dhondiya Wagh, Swami Aparampar, Rani Chennamma, Sangolli Rayanna, Nargund Baba
Saheb, Mundargi Bimaraya, Surpur Venkatappa Nayak, Bedas of Halagali and
others. Moreover, the revolts and networks clearly demonstrate the development
of a broad national consciousness among Indian people much before the so called
modern era, despite India being composed of many nationalities, languages,
religious sects, cultures and castes.
References:
1) “Kannada
Bhoopradesha galallina Sashastra Bandayagalu” (Armed uprisings in
Kannada Region)- by Dr D N Yogeeshwarappa, from Charitrika Karnataka (History
of Colonial and Contemporary Karnataka)-Ed by Dr C R Govinda Raju (2010),
Kannada
2)“Peasant
Revolt of Nagar in 1830-31”-Dr Siddalinga Swamy, pre-print
3) N. Shyam
Bhat, “South Kanara, 1799–1860: a study in colonial administration and regional
response”,1998,
4) “Ramoshi/
Berad-Lingayat-Maratha Heroism, Jain Dilemma and the Haider Ali-Tipu Sultan
Memory: Perspicacious 1858 Karnataka
Battles”, Chapter 55, War of
Civilisations- India AD 1857, Vol II –by Amaresh Misra, Rupa & Co (2008)
